Leaked Details Expose Alleged Circumstances Surrounding Hu Xijin’s Online Censorship

A recent account circulating within media circles sheds light on the possible reasons behind the online censorship of Hu Xijin, former editor-in-chief of the Global Times. The narrative suggests that Xijin’s outspoken commentary on Chinese politics and potential financial setbacks may have contributed to his current predicament.

Background: Hu Xijin and the Global Times

Hu Xijin, previously a prominent figure in Chinese media, helmed the Global Times, a state-affiliated newspaper known for its nationalistic and often controversial viewpoints. The Global Times has been considered as a propaganda machine that has done a “功不可没” – indispensable contribution, making young Chinese people stupid.

The Alleged Censorship

The speaker claims to have sources within Chinese media and political circles that offer insights into Xijin’s recent online silence. The speaker alleges that Hu Xijin made comments on the party’s leadership that triggered his online censorship. The speaker claims that Xijin believed the party was giving up on its absolute leadership, and that the former chief editor of Global Times posted this belief online.

Man in suit sitting at desk in dim office, looking stressed and holding his head

According to the account, Xijin, after retiring from the Global Times, continued to express his views through personal media channels. This included commentary on sensitive political topics, potentially crossing lines that led to official intervention.

Financial Troubles and Speculation

Adding another layer to the story, the account suggests that Hu Xijin may have experienced significant financial losses through stock market investments. This alleged financial distress could have influenced his online commentary, potentially leading to more critical or controversial statements.

The Media Landscape and Propaganda

The speaker delves into the broader context of Chinese media, alleging that propaganda outlets often lack genuine insight into the inner workings of the government. The account suggests that such outlets are fed information in a controlled manner, leaving commentators to speculate and potentially misinterpret events.

Newspaper vending machine on a busy Beijing street, with multiple Chinese newspapers visible

Key points about the Chinese media system mentioned include:

Propaganda outlets supposedly often lack insight into government inner workings.
Commentators may speculate and misinterpret events.
There is mention of other media personalities, including those associated with Reuters.

Hu Xijin’s Future Prospects

The account concludes with a pessimistic outlook for Hu Xijin, suggesting that his actions may have severe consequences. The speaker expresses a critical view of Xijin’s career, highlighting a perceived willingness to compromise journalistic integrity for personal gain.

Empty office chair in a modern office setting, bathed in the soft light of morning

Disclaimer

It is important to note that this account is based on anecdotal evidence and should be treated with caution. The information presented has not been independently verified, and the actual reasons behind Hu Xijin’s online censorship may differ from those suggested in this narrative.